Which is More Dynamic - Narrative or Dialogue?
It’s a
question that’s often asked. Which is more dynamic – narrative or
dialogue? And if there is a difference,
should you use one more than the other?
Dynamic
storytelling means the story has varied pace and can move forward at the right
moments – something that’s lively and active. There are two elements that do
this – narrative and dialogue. But what about description? Unfortunately it
doesn’t move the story along – its role is to describe scenes to the reader.
Narrative and dialogue, however, do move the story forward.
We think of
narrative as simple explanation, with no real importance. It’s snippets of information
to prop up the story, which may explain why it isn’t often thought of as
dynamic. The smaller those informative bites are, the better. Readers pay more
attention to small amounts of information rather large chunks of it. These
smaller packages of narrative help move the story along to a degree, but not nearly
enough as dialogue would.
Dialogue, on
the other hand, is naturally seen as dynamic because of the immediacy it
creates, and because it’s present tense. Dialogue fuels the story, it increases
pace and moves things along and it creates the perception that it’s ‘now’ or
‘of the moment’. It happens in real time and it delivers the right information
to the reader in the least amount of time.
For these
reasons, dialogue is one of the best tools for moving the story forward.
The thing
about writing is that it’s all about balance. Writers should look for a balance
of narrative, dialogue and description; otherwise they’re in danger of creating
the Goldilocks Effect – not too much of one thing, and not too little, but just
the right amount for an all-round good read.
Dialogue
"tells" rather than shows, because it's dialogue. When you speak to
someone, you are talking (telling). You don’t act out the conversation like a
game of charades. That’s why dialogue can only tell – by virtue of one character
telling something to another, and that’s why it’s active and dynamic.
Dialogue
only accounts for a small percentage of the average book compared with larger
portions of narrative and description. Take an average book and pare it down to
the ratios of dialogue, narrative and description and you’ll find that dialogue
doesn’t score as highly as you think, despite it being such an important
element. Tighten further still to the number of speakers in the story and the
total number of chapters and the result it would eye-opening.
This is why
dialogue is a vital tool. It doesn't carry much emotion on its own, it never
has, except through suggestion, where specific words lead the reader, for
example, "I wish you were dead!". This is a leading sentence. There's
no emotion here, except that which is suggested by the word 'dead' and an
exclamation mark. The same could be for, "I love you", "I lost my
child" or "You lied to me..."
These words suggest
emotion to the reader, but never show it. And they logically can't, because
fictional dialogue doesn't have actual sound, tone or pitch like TV or movies.
The emotion - the pain, the intent, the humour - comes from the beats and
kinesics we insert between dialogue - the part that forms the 'showing' part of
it, e.g.:
The awful sensation clawed at her
chest. Her voice pitched and her eyes shuttered. "I wish you were
dead!"
Now the
emotion is there, because the snippets of narrative lend support to the
dialogue.
Supposedly,
93% of conversation is non-verbal (Albert Mehrabian, 1971). It's one good
reason why we need to show it, with the help of narrative. So, to answer the
question of whether narrative or dialogue is more dynamic, the answer is, of
course, dialogue.
But it
cannot truly be considered dynamic without the benefit of narrative.
Next week: What comes first - plot or characters?
Comments
Post a Comment