Dealing with Rejection – Part 2

As stated in part 1, there aren’t many writers who relish a rejection.  It’s a word that most fear, and some hate, while others – usually those experienced enough to have plastered an entire room with rejections – simply shrug and carry on.

But the thing to remember with rejections is that not all are bad.  Receiving one can be a positive experience – although it won’t feel like it at the time.

Turning rejection into a positive thing

Is there such a thing?

Actually there is.  Rejections can be, for want of a better cliché, a blessing in disguise. 

Without them, writers wouldn’t be able to improve and develop.  But how is that possible?

Rejections, on the whole, usually specify where the story lacks, whether it is weak, or needs stronger characterisation, or there maybe plot pitfalls etc. The editor might have taken the time to point out some possible improvements.  This means that the story could be strengthened rather than dumped into the nearest bin. 

Feedback should enable the writer to learn from those errors and improve their work.  This is a continual learning process – rejections means ironing out the flaws and making the work the best you can possibly make it.

It is up to writers to digest the advice and suggestions given by editors – if they truly want to improve and develop - and they should rewrite the story to make it much better and stronger.  They would then be in a position to resubmit work.

It’s not uncommon to receive several rejections for the same piece of work – but the idea is to remain positive, take on board any comments and edit the work, improving it all the time.  That’s how we learn and develop as writers.

There are occasions when you receive a summary rejection with no comments, so it’s very disheartening to know where you have gone wrong.  With these types of rejections it is best to re-examine the work and go through it thoroughly to see where you can improve the piece, because writers can always improve on their work.  Fact.

Always think like an editor, too:  Is the story strong enough?  Are the characters well thought out?  Is the plot water-tight?  Is there a balance of description, narrative and dialogue?  Is it believable?  Does it grab the editor’s attention?  Are there any grammar mistakes, etc?

 Reacting positively to rejection:

·        Be professional.  Always take on board any comments – editors are there to help you improve.  If you disagree with comments or criticism, then have someone else look over your work for further opinions – a fellow writer or editor. 

·         Make sure you are not overreacting or taking it personally.  You control the writing – the writing should never control the writer.

·         Always look over your story for ways improve it.  Think like an editor.  Don’t write a good story, write a great story.

·         Let it motivate you to do better.  Remember, rejections help create better writers.

·         Be persistent.  Don’t let rejections turn into negativity.  Pull your socks up and get on with the job in hand – making that story better and stronger. 

·         Keep submitting.  The more you submit, he likelier it is to get an acceptance.  Hard work does pay off in the end.

·         Self-revision is a key factor in recognising strengths and weaknesses in your creative writing, so make sure you revise your work thoroughly before sending it to editors/publishers.

·         Never give up.

Above all, plan to receive a rejection.  It is an essential part of being a writer. It’s less of a disappointment when it does happen, but a fantastic bonus if it’s accepted.

Finally, take heart that the vast majority of famous novelists have been rejected umpteen times throughout their careers.  They did as most writers do – they dusted themselves down, took on board the criticism, swallowed their pride an got on with the job – writing.

Next week: Writing from experience.

Comments

  1. L12 February 2013 at 08:55

    Thanks for your take on rejection. It's good to know that others experience it too and the best way to tackle it.

    After initial pouting, I have to grudgingly admit that the the criticism given is usually positive and improves the piece. Still, practice makes perfect and you have to pick yourself up and get on with it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous16 February 2013 at 20:03

    Great post, thanks.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter & Novel Lengths

Just how long should a chapter be? What’s the best length? And does a novel have to fit into a set amount of words? These are just two of the most common questions asked by writers.   They assume they have to work to a strict template of X amount of words and X amount of chapters, usually because most novels have around 30 or 40 chapters and around 80,000 words.   Novel Lengths Firstly, let’s dispel a few myths - novel lengths are dictated by the story itself, not the writer or the editor or a specific written formula.   Secondly, writers don’t have to fit their word count into generic set amounts.   Again, the story will dictate how long the novel will be. It’s also worth knowing the different types of novels that work well with different word counts.   Uncomplicated stories containing minimal characters tend to be short – usually around 20,000 to 60,000 words.   These are called novellas. Longer, more complex stories, which contain a handful o...
Read more

What Makes a Story Dark?

If you’re a horror writer or you love to write dark, psychological stories and thrillers, or moralistic tales, this is the one question that needs an answer. Wanting a dark story and writing one are two different things, so how do you actually make a story dark? To answer that you first have to understand what is meant by ‘dark’. We usually define ‘dark’ as quantifiable elements that we know and are familiar with, but it’s more than that. Dark doesn’t necessarily mean scary or gory with a crazy psychopath going around chopping people into bits. Instead we have to think of ‘dark ‘as anything outside our accepted rose-tinted reality. Dark is the underbelly of our society; it’s the handling of ideas, themes, social issues and behaviours that would be seen as morally unacceptable. It’s less about fictional monsters but more about the real monsters that lurk in the shadows, something that is underscored by our fears and anxieties. It’s the unknown, because the things we don’t know ...
Read more

Modifiers, Intensifiers and Qualifiers - Part 2

Unlike modifiers, which modify words or phrases, an Intensifier is a term for a modifier that amplifies the meaning of the word it modifies. An intensifier is used exclusively to modify adverbs and adjectives and is placed  before the word it is meant to modify.  In simple terms, the intensifier emphasises adverbs and adjectives - it makes them more intense . The word is derived from Latin, meaning to “intend or stretch”. In grammatical terms, the intensifier lends no weight to the meaning of a sentence other than to give it an additional emotional nuance to the word it is modifying, however, since they modify adverbs and adjectives, they should be treated in the same way adverbs adjectives – used little and sparingly wherever possible within your writing. This is where learning to spot them will benefit your quality of writing. Intensifiers are attributive and serve only to fill space, so unless there is a valid reason to intensify the meaning and emotion ...
Read more