The Trouble with Supporting Characters
With most
stories, we create supporting characters to help tell the story; a way of
adding dimension, depth and colour, as well as lending support – be it in a
good way or bad way – to the protagonist.
A story full
of people is like real life. Some are good, some bad and some are fleeting. In
fiction they have an important role to play because those supporting characters
help the writer tell a vivid story that keeps the reader involved by sometimes
utilising them as viewpoint characters. They may even be involved in subplots.
To help move
the story forward, they are involved to a degree with the protagonist and
his/her story, therefore they can cause conflict, change the direction of the
story or affect the lead character. All this helps the reader understand the
complex dynamics of characterisation.
But there
are some drawbacks with supporting characters, and writers usually don’t
discover these problems until they are well into writing their novels.
Most
supporting characters that inhabit the main story shouldn’t really number more
than a handful, otherwise the reader may become confused with who is who and it
may be difficult for the reader (and the writer) to keep track of a multitude
of people. Aim for clarity and don’t overburden a manuscript with a cast of
hundreds.
Most novels have the protagonist and antagonist as main or primary characters.
The secondary or supporting characters tend to be family members, close friends
or colleagues, sidekicks/partners – who may be with the hero or they could be
associated with the villain - mentors or teacher types, and of course, the clichéd
love interest.
So what are the drawbacks of these supporting characters?
The main one is that some secondary characters have a habit of taking
over or stealing the spotlight. In other words, the writer hasn’t recognised
that the character has overshadowed the protagonist. This is a common problem, particularly
in the first draft, because the writer is simply writing the bare bones of the
story and needs to get it written.
First drafts tend to be the foundation of the story; the skeletal structure
that will ultimately become a full blown novel, so the writing isn’t that structured,
it may meander from the main plot from time to time and some things may fall
into the background when they should be in the foreground.
These issues are ironed out in editing and redrafting. The writer should
spot this. Remember that the story is about the protagonist – it’s his or her
personal story, so the majority of the spotlight should always be on your hero.
If you see that one of the supporting characters has stolen that
spotlight, then you need to make some cuts to bring your main character back
into focus.
But how do you spot this? The best way to check is to count how many of
your chapters relate to your protagonist. Then count how many relate to secondary
characters. Most novels will have a main character percentage that hits around
70%. So if you see that Character B
appears in 35% of the book, Character C appears in 20% and Character D is 10%,
you will see just how much of the limelight your protagonist has by comparison.
In this example, the hero appears in only 35% of the time, which is the same as
Character B.
So whose story is it? The protagonist or Character B? If the balance isn’t addressed, it can cause
major headaches and the reader may not be sure just whose story it really is.
The other problem with your supporting characters is that often – and this
occurs with new writers – one or more turn into a cliché. The love interest character is a cliché,
there’s no getting away from it. It’s up to the writer to make the writing dynamic
and clever enough to escape that label and present the story in such a unique
way that it’s not even noticeable.
As an example, the “damsel in distress who needs rescuing” character is
a huge cliché and almost always crops up in manuscripts. This is the 21st
Century – women can kick ass, too. The other most often used clichéd character
is the “stupid woman” who never listens to her hero boyfriend and decides to
leave the safety of the car to investigate the creepy noises, despite being
told not to. Or the one that runs from the haunted house in nine inch stilettoes
and keeps falling over. There is also the one that walks stupidly into danger
so that the hero can – you guessed it – rush in a save her. This is contrivance ex machina.
Not all women are stupid and need the hero to save them every other
chapter. The amount of writers that still do this is astonishing.
Another problem is that writers often inadvertently switch importance of
characters halfway through writing, which means the protagonist and secondary
character swap places. This confuses the story for the writer and reader. Be
aware of this and correct it at editing and redrafting stage, or rewrite the
story to change the protagonist. Be clear before you start writing just whose
story it is.
Sometimes the supporting cast can turn out to be more wooden than a
forest. If that happens, the story won’t have the support it needs, since the secondary
characters help to tell the story. Characterisation is just as important for
them as it is for your protagonist.
Supporting characters may not share equal spotlight with the hero, but
their presence is what makes the story, so it’s important that they help bring
the story to life without causing trouble. Be clear from the start who your
characters are and what role they will play.
That way you will avoid these common problems.
Next week: Why your story needs high stakes.
Comments
Post a Comment