Dialogue Dilemmas – Part 1
Ground Rules
Dialogue is straightforward if you know how to do it properly, and shouldn’t present any problems, but lately I’ve seen many self-published books that use incorrect or badly structured dialogue. Writers are still getting it wrong.
Dialogue is straightforward if you know how to do it properly, and shouldn’t present any problems, but lately I’ve seen many self-published books that use incorrect or badly structured dialogue. Writers are still getting it wrong.
If you want
to go down the route of traditional publishing, i.e. finding an agent or
publisher, then it’s paramount that the silly mistakes found all over
self-published work isn’t apparent when you submit to an editor for scrutiny.
Dialogue should be correct and properly structured, which means writers
should be aware of ground rules. Once you know those ground rules, you can
concentrate on the technicality of constructing dialogue.
Move the
story forward
Firstly, dialogue is necessary to move the story forward. That means
it should be concise, it should get to the point and relay pertinent
information to the reader as part of the continuing story arc.
Dialogue should never turn into an info-dump - in other words, don’t
fill your scenes with huge chunks of dialogue relaying backstory or unimportant
details. This can put your reader off, plus it means the story arc has lost
focus.
Here’s a simple example common to many writers – the dialogue
backstory/info dump:
Amy stared
at the grey slime. ‘We’ll need to get samples of this stuff.’
‘I know
all about molecular biology because I studied it at university and I spent
several years training in the field,’ Dan said. ‘That means I’m well qualified
to assess this situation with my experience, I’ve worked with most of the top
biologists…’
This is enough to send the reader to sleep. The information about Dan
and his qualifications and experience isn’t necessary in dialogue because it sounds
too stilted and feigned. Background information should be sprinkled through the
narrative as part of his characterisation.
The dialogue could be written like this instead:
Amy stared
at the grey slime. ‘We’ll need to get samples of this stuff.’
‘I agree,’
Dan said. ‘I can run several tests back
at the lab, see if we can extract some DNA and find out what creature this came
from.’
The second example is more concise; it gets to the point and moves the
story forward.
Realism
The other thing to remember is that dialogue should be realistic, to a
point. In everyday life, conversations can drag on about peripheral, unimportant
stuff and often filled with strange pauses and lots of ‘ums’ etc. They may say
‘Er…’ or ‘eh?’ a lot. They especially say, ‘you know’ and ‘like’ as well. For example:
‘He was
like, you know, really friendly and everything, and, well, I really liked him
and I wished I’d given him my number, you know?’
The dialogue can still retain a sense of realism, but without the colloquialisms. These are the things you leave out. For example:
‘He was friendly and I really liked him.
I just wish I’d given him my number.’
Another important ground rule is to use correct dialogue tags. ‘He said’
and ‘she said’ become almost invisible to the reader after a while; however,
writers shouldn’t rely on them too heavily. Instead, structure sentences so you
don’t always have to use them.
The same rule applies for the use of more descriptive tags such as ‘she
whined’ or ‘he cried’ etc. Many writers
still use these, when in reality they’re rarely required if you’ve got sentence
structures right. For example:
‘Why did
you do it?’ she wailed.
The use of ‘she wailed’ is unnecessary and weakens the dialogue. The way
to cut out the need for them is to insert narrative in order to show
character the emotions, for example:
Tears fell
across her cheeks. Her voice pitched. ‘Why did you do it?’
This version removes the need for silly dialogue tags and shows the
reader that the character is emotional simply by mentioning the tears and
pitched voice. It’s that easy to step away from the habit of unnecessary
dialogue tags.
Dialogue
Length
Another similar method to the example above is to add character actions in
between dialogue to add a touch of realism. If you find that you’ve written a
particularly long section of dialogue, then character actions helps break up
the dialogue into manageable sections, for example:
‘It was
only when I got to the bedroom that I noticed she’d gone,’ Dan said. ‘I never
heard a thing, not the door opening or the stairs creaking, absolutely nothing,
but I guess you don’t when in a deep sleep.’ He rubbed his temples. ‘Now I feel
so terrible that I didn’t wake, I couldn’t help her…’
You can see that the insertion of action breaks the length of dialogue
and helps pace the sentences. It’s not a must, but they’re a good way to slip
in little snippets of tone, tension and emotion, and they also allow the reader
to pause briefly before continuing.
Vary the dialogue lengths, give them pace. Contrary to bad advice out
there, not every sentence needs to be short and to the point in the belief that
reader’s attention spans demand it. That’s pretty demeaning to your reader.
Longer sections of dialogue are just acceptable as short ones. Just make sure
you pace them and add character actions to break them up and make them
interesting.
Dialect
This seems to bother a lot of writers because they assume that they have
to give their characters a variety of accents to make the character more real –
meaning they have to write dialogue using that accent.
This is not a bad thing, if used correctly and sparingly, but the down
side is that you could confuse the reader if it’s used too much. Reading it will
become a chore; it will put the reader off, and your character will sound like
a caricature.
The rule is always about balance. Use dialect, but don’t let it
overshadow the dialogue. Less is sometimes more.
Grammar
Unlike your narrative, which must always be grammatically correct,
dialogue is the exception. It doesn’t have to be grammatically correct,
especially with characters using dialect or slang, because this forms part of
the character’s voice and it retains a hint of realism of actual speech.
That said, as with dialects, don’t overdo it, otherwise it becomes
annoying to the reader. Keep a balance and don’t let it overshadow the rest of
the dialogue.
So, those are the ground rules. The thing to remember with dialogue is
that it is multifunctional; it does many things all at once. Dialogue sets the
scene, it imparts pertinent information, it foreshadows, it enables
characterisation and realism and it moves the story forward as part of the
story arc.
Next week we’ll look at the technical aspects of dialogue structure, and
more importantly, how to format dialogue correctly.
Next week: Dialogue Dilemmas Part 2
pretty nice blog, following :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, Skyline Spirit.
ReplyDeleteI was unsure about the dialect thing. A lot of my characters are hillbillies, hippies, cowboys, and truckers. Thanks for the tip.
ReplyDeleteDid I spell hillbillies right?
~drift~
Hey there Drift,
DeleteHillbillies is correct.
Dialect wise, a sprinkling here and there to let your reader get a feel, but good characterisation means they'll 'hear' those dialects/accents in their heads when they read the dialogue.
10-4 Thanks, AJ.
ReplyDelete"He was like, you know, really friendly and everything, and, well, I really liked him and I wished I’d given him my number, you know?"
ReplyDeleteIt might just be me, but in a very specific circumstance I would have to say I like this passage better than your correction. If everybody in the story talked like this it would be a nightmare, but if it's only this one character, and the character is someone we're meant to find kind of ditzy, her over-use of "like" and "you know" can say a lot more about her character in a sentence than pages of description.
Then again, dialogue is absolutely my weakest point. Every time I write dialogue I wind up going over it maybe dozens of times until it feels right to me.
Hi Brian,
DeleteGood point, I hear what you are saying. It was merely an example of the kind of dialogue that a good many writers still use. It's the kind you should use very sparingly - just to give your characters a bit of flair, so by all means use a bit of slang here and there, or a few colloquialisms, but so many writers continue to fill their entire novel with this kind of drivel, which may hinder your chances of impressing an agent or editor.