How to Avoid Author Intrusion
I’ve written
about this subject in the past, but I keep getting asked about it, so it’s
worth another visit, especially if you are new to writing and you want to
understand what author intrusion is, and more importantly, how to avoid it.
New writers,
in particular, sometimes have a tendency to intrude the narrative. It’s not their fault – it is sometimes done
without realising, and that’s because many new writers aren’t armed with a
wealth of knowledge and experience to always know these things.
That’s where
the beauty of editing comes in. We can spot the anomalies and correct them. Not
only that, but all writers have done it at some stage in their writing careers,
so it is quite a common occurrence.
What does Authorial Intrusion mean?
In basic
terms, author intrusion happens when the author loses sight of the story and
speaks directly to the reader through the narrative or characters. They
inadvertently project their own beliefs, opinions or ideas into the story. In other words, any social, political or
religious beliefs should come from your characters, in context with the story,
and not from you directly.
It also
means that sometimes authors unintentionally project themselves into the
narrative. The author becomes the star of the show, not the characters. New writers do this a lot because the only
true character they know is themselves, rather than creating a multidimensional
character from scratch. Again, this is not uncommon.
How do I identify it?
The best way to look for author intrusion is to first finish writing
your story/novel and then put it aside for a while, perhaps a week or two. You
can then come back to it with fresh eyes and a fresh perspective, and treat the
story like an editor would. You will soon notice any unwarranted intrusion.
Sometimes such intrusions are subtle and not always overt. They may
consist of certain words or axioms that seem out of place within the context
of the story. In other words, they just don’t fit within the story, and
certainly don’t fit with your character – perhaps because they may not be words
or phrases your character would ever use.
Learn to spot these.
Other times, as mentioned, the author might drift into automatic mode
and describe the things they personally enjoy, projecting their
own likes, pastimes or hobbies into the narrative and characters, when in fact the
main character they have created may actually be diametrically opposite.
You might find your characters going on and on about a particular
subject throughout the story that has nothing to do with the actual story or
themes, particularly in a judgemental way. That’s intrusion because you are
using your characters as a mouthpiece for your own personal viewpoint.
Here’s a simple example. I personally have no religious belief. As an atheist I do not identify with religion;
however that doesn’t mean I don’t like it. I respect those who do have beliefs,
because we are all different. That means I should not have every single
character that I create be a religious hater or someone who constantly rejects
religion. We create characters with different beliefs and opinions to our own,
because they should be as individual as we are. Therefore, if I have my
characters going on about how much they are hate religion, then I would be
guilty of author intrusion.
Author
intrusion might also occur if your character has knowledge he or she wouldn’t
normally possess in ordinary day to day life (unless it really is part of the
character’s makeup and they just happen to be superhuman, extraordinary
people). For instance, a lowly salesman in a story about greed and success won’t
have an encyclopaedic knowledge of the latest military weapons or will know how
to break into a high security facility armed with only a safety pin.
That kind
of thing should stick out. It means the author has projected unrealistic
knowledge and research onto the character and therefore compromised the
structure and context of the story.
In real
life we all have limited knowledge - we know a bit about a lot of things. We
may learn about certain subjects that interest us, so we gain more
knowledge. I know a lot about fiction
writing, literature, art and the sciences, but I know nothing about car
engines, engineering or how to carry out heart surgery.
Be
particularly careful in historical fiction. Don’t let your modern views creep
into the era you are writing about. It just doesn’t fit.
And one
thing writers should never do is interrupt the narrative
and address the reader directly within the story. This was once acceptable in
literature, but over the last 80 years, literature has changed, and this kind
of intrusion is no longer acceptable.
Learn to
recognise these anomalies in your narrative, hunt them down and weed them out.
How do I avoid author intrusion?
One thing
should always be clear from the outset when writing your story – it belongs to
your characters, not you as a writer. That means your personal beliefs,
opinions or ideas should never appear. For that reason, writers must never use
fiction as a personal soapbox or crusade against something they oppose or don’t
like.
In real life
you may not like the way your government is running your country. You may not
agree with war and conflict; however you must put aside these opinions when
dealing with your characters and plot. Your main character shouldn’t hate one
particular political party because you don’t like them, nor should they
be a pacifist against war when it’s not in your character’s nature and they
might have to engage in fight scenes as part of the story.
Writers
should treat the narrative objectively and dispassionately. Your character’s
opinions matter, not yours. Their beliefs relate to the story,
not yours.
This might seem
strange, considering that the omniscient narrator will know everything within
the story, but it should not sound like the narrator is preaching a sermon to
the reader. The narrator is simply relaying the story - objectively.
With
experience you will learn to stand back from your fictional world and let your
characters speak for themselves and to form their own views and opinions as
part of the ongoing story – it’s a natural progression.
Your
fictional story should never be about your personal agenda; otherwise your
story will fail. Editors will easily spot it and reject on that basis, because
it is a sign of bad writing.
Be thorough
when you edit your work and learn to spot author intrusion.
Next week:
Literary devices – Improve your narrative
Thank You. Your posts are always helpful, just when I need them, it seems.
ReplyDeleteReal
My knack of timing...
DeleteI find this topic interesting, but it presents something of a dilemma for me. I agree that projecting too much of oneself onto characters is bad, particularly when out of context, but aren't all stories essentially vehicles for our personal convictions? In your use of the example about the lowly salesman, you said "in a story about greed and success". Surely the author of that will have something to say about greed and success. Is that to be avoided as well?
ReplyDeleteHi Hexagon,
DeleteI understand your dilemma, however, you will be pleased to know that in a fictional sense it isn't actually a dilemma. It's good that you have raised the question about the balance of projecting oneself too much in the narrative and the author saying something about personal convictions, however there is actually a difference.
The example of 'greed and success' are themes. That means they would not be my personal opinions about them, but rather objective and researched observations about what greed or success is or means, and how these themes would be applied to the lead character's personal story.
Fiction is about explaining the human condition i.e. what makes us do the things we do. As writers we explore themes and provide answers for our characters. When I write about things that interest me or provoke certain thoughts and emotions, I ensure that I explore those themes through the characters, in context with the plot and subplots, conflicts, motives etc. I do not, however, let my personal opinions creep into the narrative.
To keep with the example, as the writer I would explain the themes of greed and success to the reader, the motives of the characters involved, the consequences of their actions and ultimately reveal the lessons learned on their journey to the conclusion of the story. What it won't reveal is my very personal dislike of greed or my absolute love of success, because HOW I write about it would make all the difference. By all means make a statement using themes, have something to say, but try hard not to make it too personally revealing, otherwise the reader will think you're preaching.
Hope that helps in some way.
T