Why Appraisal is Important
Writers rarely think about
feedback and appraisal while they’re writing.
The story always takes precedence. But there will come a point, however, when
the novel or short story is finally finished – finished in the writer’s eyes –
that the work should be appraised.
Feedback is such an important
tool for writers, and not nearly exploited enough. The idea is that a selective range of people
– fellow writers perhaps, and ordinary folk – read your work and provide you
with constructive feedback.
This obviously means opening
yourself to criticism, however is it important to point out that it is useless
becoming a writer unless you can’t take criticism. As a writer, the very work you produce becomes
a part of the public domain, so by the very act of publishing a story, you are
and can be the subject of criticism. You cannot avoid it, and the quicker you
become accustomed to it, the better it will be to deal with.
Why get people to read your work?
Even if we hate the idea, the
purpose of letting others read our stories is multifunctional – it helps us to understand
our writing, it helps us to understand errors, and over time it helps us
improve.
Critique from those who read your work is an
important writing process in also understanding your level of skill, your
writing limitations and the need for development in weak areas, because
whatever you have missed, no matter how good an editor you are, the reader will
inevitably notice.
Think of the feedback as market
research. Large companies will regularly carry out market research to see if
members of the public like their new products, their branding, their tastes
etc. Public opinion is very important
here; it gives the company an idea if their product works or wither it needs improvement.
Nobody likes criticism, but it is
a necessary evil where writing is concerned.
Not everyone who reads your story will like it – that is a logical given
– but the people you choose should offer constructive and subjective criticism,
the kind that helps rather than harms.
We all know that harmful criticism can cause untold problems for
writers, so it is important to choose with care a reading peer group who can be
objective.
Who do I choose to read my work?
1. Writing groups can provide
plenty of guidance and support and constructive appraisal.
2. Friends are better than
family, simply because there is a better chance of them being objective. Mom or Dad or Auntie Jean will tell you that
your novel is wonderful, even if it isn’t.
3. Some writers choose
professional critique services, but that all depends on cost.
4. It’s possible that a tutor or
fellow writing professional might also read your work and offer valuable
feedback.
By sharing their work with others
and by listening to their feedback and critique, writers who are willing to
learn will have an instant advantage over those who don’t share.
Advantages of appraisal:
·
Mistakes that you
otherwise missed are spotted – grammatical or otherwise.
·
Plot flaws that you
thought were tight might be spotted.
This is common because writers become so close to the work that they
don’t always see mistakes.
·
It gives you an idea
about the strength of your writing – the person reading the work will tell you
if there is too much waffle or too little description etc.
·
It gives you an idea
of whether the story is actually any good – does it stand up to scrutiny? Does the reader actually like it or loathe
it?
·
Most importantly, it’s
a way of measuring how well you handle criticism.
The universal reaction is usually
‘they don’t know what they’re talking about, they’re not writers. My story is brilliant!’ It might be brilliant
in the eyes of the writer, but not always brilliant for the reader. Writers should understand that a reader’s
opinion matters.
Without feedback of this nature,
the major story you are working on will never be truly finished. Even some seasoned writers send out their
work for appraisal. They will know if something works, or if it doesn’t, and
they will have the humility to do what is necessary to correct it and make it better,
without throwing all their toys out of the pram and slinking into a cave to
sulk.
Once some of the problems have
been identified, fixed and double checked, then a story or MSS will be ready for an
agent or publisher’s scrutiny.
If a writer can get over the
initial reaction of being criticised, then they will find this process
invaluable.
If you can’t handle criticism,
then there’s no point being a writer.
Next week: The title is vital
Comments
Post a Comment